Sunday, May 6, 2012

Bounce Plays 101






"The Harder The Crash, The Higher The Bounce!"



When playing the bounce, my favorite 'tool' for catching falling knives is the Fibonacci retracement. 
(Works for me most of the time) 


The lines "Buy the fear" or "Buy when there is blood on the streets" have their merits when it comes to technicals. 
But hey! Don't worry, I won't be explaining what I just wrote. 
I just felt like writing it because it felt right. Hahaha. Here I go again.


I'm currently just too lazy to explain how to play the bounce in such lengthy detail. 
After all, there is no such thing as absolute truth when it comes to technicals. 


Only possibilities. 


But to save you from all my nonsense. Here's an example. Watch and Learn:





Another thing to remember when you bet your balls on the bounce:
Never listen to market noise. Don't let your judgement get swayed.

SELL THE BOUNCE!


But If you do listen? 


Well... At least try to feel the 'force' and try to be like this guy:





Happy Bouncing!




Currently Applying these on ORE/MARC.
Check my port : (Click Here) - para di nyo masabing i'm giving you crap:







Picks for May 7-11





ORE Chart Update 5.8.2012
ORE Chart 5.5.2012


ORE Chart Update 5.7.2012




ORE Chart Update 5.11.2012




MARC Chart Update 5.8.2012

MARC Chart 5.5.2012




MARC Chart Update 5.7.2012








PHES Chart 5.5.2012
Status Update 5.8.2012 (Did not go to desirable bounce levels)





Additional Notes on Bounce plays:

+ Always observe the "3rd day rule." For those who haven't heard of this rule, it's when you take profit on the 3rd day of a stock's ascent or buy a stock on its 3rd day decline. One very important thing to consider is that when you buy on the 3rd day (for bounce plays), the volume traded should be lower than that of the previous days' decline.

+ When you buy using Fibonacci retracements, make sure the day's closing candle doesn't violate or close below your retracement level.

+ The best candles to watch for when playing the bounce are, the abandoned baby, the hammer, and some variations of dojis. Check out these candles here: http://www.candlesticker.com/ 

+ Be sure to go for liquid stocks. Illiquid stocks usually don't bounce.

+ 61.8% and 76.4% Retracements would be the ideal crash-point for pickup.

+ To maximize profits: If on the fourth day during the bounce the stock closes strong (prices closes at the day's high) , hold and sell within the first hour of the next trading day. But in case prices gaps down on the fifth day, do not hesitate to sell when the bell dings.

+ Make a checklist of these notes: the more you have these "ingredients" on the chart, the higher the possibility of a bounce.



Of course, that's just me. Don't believe the crazy trader. Hihihi.



130 comments:

  1. this is nonsense, what would stop it from doing a fall 76.4% retracement or 100% , answer none, always easy to claim shit hindsight! this is just a warning to your would be believers, that u know better than they do when u play fibonacci, farce!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He said it works for him most of the time. Read it again but next time not stupidly. What kind of trader are you to even believe that the author's methods of trading works 100% of the time. Do you even read books of successful traders? Damn that hate is real lmao.

      Delete
  2. "always easy to claim shit hindsight" --> Currently posting updated charts and actual buying in my port.. how about that for foresight?

    "this is nonsense" --> starting tomorrow, my nonsense will MAKE me money. :p

    Chillax dude.. that's why I said, "there's no absolute truth in technicals, only possibilities." diba?
    It's my diary anyway. So I get to say what I want. Make your own. hihihi :P

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks SB! very informative.. to each his own.. courage to buy with technicals to boot..

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi SB! do I sell my ORE already??

    ReplyDelete
  5. Can't decide that for you. It's your money.

    PD: I Have ORE, and I'll hold for today. Will sell
    tomorrow or thursday depending on the momentum.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for the article. We have similar method.

    I caught MARC's bounce play before at 3.00 and sold at 3.71.

    Missed the play yesterday due to work.

    ReplyDelete
  7. makes sense... how about FDC bro? waiting for the last red candle

    ReplyDelete
  8. you'll know there are a lot of retards in the market, when they ask a complete stranger if one should sell or buy... here's the danger that i'm pointing out to u freak, u throw in big words as fibonacci to retards who wouldn't care to look for them at google, and whola your an instant guru. makes me sick!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear anonymous hater,

    I'm not sure about you...
    By the end of the day,
    I made money by my bounce play.
    how about you?

    God bless you... Hihihihi. :P

    ReplyDelete
  10. i been making money long before you wore your last diaper, i just don't like freaks claiming shit u know wont always stand in the real world, everybody would be better off if u deactivate your blog permanently.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sobrang tanga mong hater ka. It was zeefreaks' blog that enabled me to refine my trading strategy when I was just starting out. I can apply these bounce plays real time and actually profit from it so shut up. Maski anonymous si zee nakakatulong sya e ikaw tangang bobo cguro hype gurung bobo ka na pulang pula port

      Delete
    2. wag patulan ang bitter. hater ni zeefreak, show me your port? talk is cheap. peenoise

      Delete
    3. hahaha. this hater don't want us to learn more from trading. ayaw nya ipagkalat kung paano gamitin boun play.

      Delete
  11. Hey SB. Bat may hater ka na? Sikat ka na ha. hahahaha.=p

    -ron

    ReplyDelete
  12. Dear anonymous hater,

    Good that you're making money. :)

    However, this blog serves as my diary. I even put a lovely disclaimer
    for those who would risk believing the contents of this blog.

    If you're jealous of my blog, how about
    you make your OWN and help 'educate' those retards you talk about?
    Who knows, you might even help me and a lot of helpless traders out there?

    :p

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. retards belongs to special school... not because they deserve to but because they have to, those who open blogs like this and provide easy, appealing make believe quick fix to retards, and intentionally provide their link to popular lounges for beginners like T.I.E. are either desperately seeking attention or have a very dark hidden agenda, you know damn well that those who frequent that site (T.I.E) are as u may agree the not so brightest among the bunch, always asking when to sell what to buy... i implore u to heed my call and shut your blog down, before you make a believer of somebody else when you know damn well you have nothing to provide them... keep your diary to yourself that's what diaries are for, a PERSONAL account of one's self not to be shared.


      ps: providing a disclaimer on a blog like this is like taking a diabetic to a sweet shop!

      Delete
    2. Thank you for your kind words. :)

      Delete
    3. your welcome but i was not trying to be kind...i was trying to appeal to your higher human side though, that apparently didn't work.

      Delete
    4. Dude, define sarcasm. Hihihihi.

      PS: You better start taking insulin shots.

      Delete
    5. 1. sarcasm begets sarcasm, 2. insulin shots for non diabetics could be lethal, two things u have unwittingly learned today... all the more reason you should shut your blog down.

      Delete
    6. Why so serious? Chillax! :)

      Btw, I won't be able to keep you company for a while,
      talk to this guy instead http://www.simsimi.com/ - i'm sure you'll have tons of fun.

      but seriously dude.. get a girlfriend.


      unless you're gay. =p

      Delete
    7. A man, happily married, do not wake up one day and get a girlfriend at the advice of a total stranger, your ignorance, and continued disregard of morality and responsibility, both in relationships, and the stock market is all the more reason, again, that you should terminate your blog entry, don't you find it dumb, that when you could no longer argue about the criticism brought to you about your entry and the repercussions it may deliver to unsuspecting retards, that you chose to attack one's sexuality? what are you like 10 years old? i mean is that the best comeback that you can muster? believe me a year with a good therapist, could do wonders for you, i read from an article way back, when Reader's Digest was spewing great articles, that researchers found out that one's great intelligence could be attributed or traced back to cases when one's mother choose to breast feed their little ones, i'm absolutely certain that you were bottle fed. in any case, you better ask your good friend simsimi if you were bottlefed or breastfed... AND i hope you find satisfaction in the answer of computer generated text who's output could possibly have come from kids as young as 4y.o. because as they say birds of the same I.Q..... simsimi together.....

      Delete
    8. Hi Tita.. Can I call you Tita? It's kinda hard for me to address you Anonymous Hater every single time. I just couldn't resist the urge to reply to your love letter. =)

      I'm not really attacking your sexuality. Why are you so defensive? I was just concerned about you since you've got so much time in your hands that you post such lengthy comments. And now you attack my intellect basing on some article from Reader's Digest? ... FYI, I was breastfed until I was 2.

      And since you're so confident about it, I think it's safe to say that you've been breastfed when you were little... right?. I mean.. you've got this "know-it-all" atmosphere around you that I've got this crazy thought dangling in my mind that your mother's milk could have been powdered. (Again, It's Just a thought, coz I'm such a retard and I'm not "absolutely certain" - unlike you)

      http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lfo66yDtT61qahfowo1_500.gif

      Tita, I get your point. You want my blog deactivated. But that ain't happening. Get over it.

      Delete
    9. You can call me tito if you feel the need to call me something, refer to my previous reply it started with a man, happily married... so i dont see the logic on insisting on calling me tita... unless you again feel the need to divert the issue, but then again none of your previous reply showed logic, so i surmise you got your hard-headedness from your friend simsimi, you seem to enjoy his company, i still insist you were bottle fed and for good measure, better ask your mom, if you have one. Again, pride aside, consider deactivating your blog. Your in no way shape or form helping anybody, your only helping them gamble away what could be their life-long savings. Before you make a believer of somebody, consider it, because at the end of the day, you got nothing to offer them. You could either listen to me, ignore me or remove the comment section on your blog. Your call. Until you wise up, I'll continue to tell the diabetics not to go to the sweets shop.

      PS: You remind me of my 2 year old grandson, he babbles a lot just like you.

      Delete
    10. Okay Tita. Whatever you say. Be my guest. :)

      PS: You remind me of my Tita Ninny. So I'll just call you Tita.

      Delete
    11. I'ts good that you have a reasonable and responsible member in your family, Tita Ninny as u call her, however, her good genes obviously did not trickle down to you, for u are both unreasonable and irresponsible. You could have been adopted. You have one thing good going for you though, you were not born in the time of Hitler, have u been born in Germany on his time, I would not doubt for a second that you would have been exterminated on grounds of having inferior genes. I would not condone what he would have done to you though, and I think Hitler is the biggest asshole in the world. Furthermore i think that you're very lucky to be living there wherever you are, living and blogging irresponsibly as you have. The sweets shop is still open so I'll continue to warn the diabetics.

      Delete
  13. to the anonymous hater:

    chillax ka lang dude...

    "ayaw pagstrong kay magstruggle imong face" =P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. to zeefreaks:

      "define sarcasm.."

      sarcasm is a comic device, criticism expressed through scathing mockery. Sarcasm is the strongest form of irony. Although a sarcastic statement is formulated in positive terms, its negative meaning is immediately made apparent =)

      Delete
  14. anonymous hater: why the fuck are you reading his blog? This is a democratic country fool, not a communist one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. because you don't drive-thru a red light, the same way that you stop and help, when you see that somebody is getting mugged, somebody is about to get mugged if i don't expose the age old scam of pretending u know something when u really dont. you probably never even cared to think about it, because your a self centered, self indulgent asswipe, and now you call me a fool, who's the fool now? i wonder why an indolent retard like you even bothered to take the side of the freak when your another retard yourself hiding behind his little understanding of how democracy works, democracy for your information, is not absolute, it should be exercised with responsibility, something an idiot like u would never appreciate. lastly, find a better argument your ignorance is unamusing at best.

      Delete
  15. Hi Tito, please don't judge the person who owns this blog. I believe his thoughts and insights have helped a lot of newbies. The fact that he has a lot of followers reading his blog means he's being able to help. Also, I find his blog very informative. He tries to make things more comprehensible. But at the end of the day, it would still be the reader's responsibility to read more and make further studies/research. If this person is not that great, nobody would believe him. This guy has been very generous in sharing his knowledge and I believe he doesn't deserve to be judged as someone "who's seeking attention or has a very dark hidden agenda".

    Hi SB, I still think you're the COOLEST! =) AJ here.. =) chillax lang..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. di nyo ba talaga makuha ang sinasabi ni anonymous hater na madaming ta*ga sa mundo na pwedeng makabasa nitong blog, pag nabasa ng ta*ga eh di gagayahin pag ginaya ng ta*ga mauubos ang pera kasi hindi handa dahil hindi napag-aralan, nanggagaya lang sila, kailangan daw mag-aral ng ta*ga. anak ng .... tagalugin na kasi para maintindihan ng lahat.

      Delete
    2. kasalanan na ng tanga yun. eh marami naman sa mundo ang gumagamit ng utak sa ayos kaya natututo dito sa blog na to.

      Delete
  16. Hey anonymous hater! What's wrong with this blog? I made a quick buck with chi the last time zeefreaks mentioned it. Haha! Do you have your own blog as well? Why dont you share the link for the benefit of the readers here? Let's compare notes. God bless! :)

    -T

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do not have a blog of my own, i do not intend to give quick fix to idiots, again retards should go to school. I'ts between me and the freak, so if u idiots want to feel important by meddling into our squabble, prepare to be called idiots, because that's what u'll get when u try to reason with me unprepared.

      Delete
  17. Hi ZeeFreaks, thank you for your posts. God bless

    ReplyDelete
  18. ZeeFreaks you cunning bastard! Ninny = Foolish? LOL! I just love the wordplay and especially your humor! "your momma's so old, her breastmilk's powdered!" LOL! And to the hater, If zeefreaks was born in hitler's time i bet he'd be one of the top commanding officers. but anyways, why don't you provide alternative links and resources that we may be enlightened like you perhaps?

    Cheers to both of you.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Baka naman nasunog siya nung sinubukan nya yung tips ni Zee...
    TA is a matter of probability. It's not exact science.

    Maglabasan na lang kasi kayo ng portfolio. Tingnan natin kung sino talaga kumikita via trading dito.

    Fucking anonymous guest (Tita Ninny). Calling readers, and lurkers as idiots and retards. You remind me of that guy named, Cliff the Investor. Nababawasan ata ng readers yung blog nya, kaya dito na dumapo.

    ReplyDelete
  20. another idiot just posted ahead of me, another meddlesome imbecile who felt the need to become important without reading the preceding conversation, "nasunog" as u coined it, is what i'm driving at, uneducated retards as i have pointed out are possible future victims of the freaks irresponsible blog and what it offers, a quick fix. If i remind you of cliff, that may be because we MAY share the same view of EDUCATION. I dont know the guy and if u have issues with him it's your business, but wait, you remind me of countless hyping idiot's posting after a former guru in traderspizza who now has a site of his own, you remind me of those who hype the guru and not the stock. I have little respect for those who hype the stock but none whatsoever to the one's who hype the guru, and total admonition to those who hype guru wannabes.

    ReplyDelete
  21. As smart as this anonymous hater may seem, I think it's unfortunate that the whole point of having a blog is lost on him. It's one thing to have your opinion expressed but forcing the issue is quite another. From the way he writes, I assume he has made a good living for himself out of the markets using fundamental analysis and is convinced that any method other than his own is just nonsense. It's impossible to reason with such close-minded people who sadly have been left behind by time and is ignorant of the "new" approaches to the markets, they immediately go to the offensive without reading further into the merits of these "new" methods. In my opinion, everything about the blog warns the diabetics of the dangers of going into the sweet shop, people know they're risking money whenever they try new methods. Who knows, they might end up making more money than you right? We're in the markets and in the business of making money, you can come up with sound arguments one after another but in the end, you'll know you're right when you have the returns to show for it.

    Anyway, I would also like to ask the owner of blog something. Have you read any books by Jeff Cooper? They seem to fit your style of trading

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. to the subtle assumptionista(who made so many assumptions of me), who posted ahead of me:

      I'm quite baffled by a comment made by Senator Pia Cayetano on ANC calling the Chief Justice's recent senate appearance as a premeditated act judging by the CJ's coherent and in-control appearance. As we all know by now the CJ is a diabetic, so skipping meals is ill advised for those who have one, he apparently did skip meal. It could be his fault that he is a diabetic(lifestyle) or it could be genetic(God's design). In any case having diabetes is a serious matter and not meant to be judged in any way. Diabetes if detected early can be controlled with proper monitoring and the proper EDUCATION, same as stocks trading, it can be learned through proper EDUCATION, no shortcuts, no quick fixes. I have a question for you assumptionista, do you believe that every child needs to go to pre-school & grade school? if yes, continue reading, if not, find a blog about pre-schools & grade school and recommend it to every parent you know and stop reading this, do you think that the same child after grade school should go to high school? if yes continue reading, if not find a blog about high school learnings and recommend it to every parent you know and stop reading this, do you think that the same child who went through pre-school & grade school and high school should continue to college and get a degree? If yes, continue reading, if not find another blog about a degree in college and recommend it to every parent you know and stop reading this. If you are still reading then you obviously believe in proper EDUCATION, you should then help me warn the diabetics not to go to the sweets shops and instead go to a school for proper EDUCATION. And please quit making assumptions on me, I assure you none of your assumptions on me are absolute truth. Believe me for every Mark Zuckerberg who left Harvard to venture on his own endeavor, thousands stayed and finished their proper EDUCATION. With all that i have said if you still think i am ignoramus and as u said was left in time, then I think you are a true blooded ASSUMPTIONISTA. Lay down your crown and come back down to earth and count the multitudes losing money on trades advised/hyped by Gurus and Guru wannabees. EDUCATION is the key always has been always will be.



      PS: here's a stat for you you can google this for reference, "The North American Securities Administrators Association reports that 70 percent of all day traders lose money".

      Delete
    2. education is not absolute dude it's not the answer to all our problems sometimes it helps to be resourceful and supplement it with other learnings.

      Delete
    3. education is not absolute it's not the sole answer to our problems and sometimes it helps to be resourceful and supplement it with other learnings

      Delete
  22. Wow the comments on this post are really entertaining. I understand that anonymous "Tito" wants to warn public, but he should have just provided a fair warning or at least an argument as to why he is debunking the blogger's technique. I find it too arrogant for a person to ask someone to terminate his blog if it does not conform to his beliefs.

    What are you? a Philippine Politician? =D

    I've been in the market for quite some time and I never stayed in one technique because the market and players keep on changing. There's no proven method when it comes to trading (except for Cayce's I guess =D).

    I studied TA for years, mastered accounting and financial analysis for decades, learned quant analysis, but boy believe me... nothing beats insider info. If you do not know it, then you do not know it.

    ~mp

    ReplyDelete
  23. Wow the comments on this post are really entertaining. I understand that anonymous "Tito" wants to warn public, but he should have just provided a fair warning or at least an argument as to why he is debunking the blogger's technique. I find it too arrogant for a person to ask someone to terminate his blog if it does not conform to his beliefs.

    What are you? a Philippine Politician? =D

    I've been in the market for quite some time and I never stayed in one technique because the market and players keep on changing. There's no proven method when it comes to trading (except for Cayce's I guess =D).

    I studied TA for years, mastered accounting and financial analysis for decades, learned quant analysis, but boy believe me... nothing beats insider info. If you do not know it, then you do not know it.

    ~mp

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nine words, I HOPE THE PSE REGULATORS ARE NOT READING THIS!
      Your morality is apparently worse than the freak's. I have a question for you, have you made money on insider info? If yes then PSE regulators or wherever you trade should find your ass and haul you to court. If not, then you are just babbling words, you heard from someone who has done it(insider trading). Your not even in my maid's league. I consider you as another babbling idiot who wants to feel important by sticking his head out, meddling in to other people's affairs. A chismosa. Wait that's a good name for you. CHISMOSA. As my spanish teacher one's said "el necio charlatán es una pérdida de aire limpio" (a babbling fool is a waste of clean air)

      Delete
    2. he has as "MAID" .. she invest? :D

      Delete
    3. I 'm pretty sure I saw something about maids investing somewhere. :3

      Delete
  24. @ anonymous tita: Man, you're really good at degrading people.

    ReplyDelete
  25. What do you think of BSC sir?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Get a grip, tita hater. Check your grammar and logic. They suck. You suck. Are you Leptokurtosis of SMP?

    ReplyDelete
  27. AnonymousMay 7, 2012 at 1:37 PM

    "this is nonsense, what would stop it from doing a fall 76.4% retracement or 100% , answer none, always easy to claim shit hindsight! this is just a warning to your would be believers, that u know better than they do when u play fibonacci, farce!"

    MY COMMENTS: 1. It's more corect to ask this: "WHAT WOULD STOP IT FROM FALLING TO 76.4% OR DOING A RETRACEMENT at 100%?"; 2. WOULD-BE BELIEVERS and not WOULD BE BELIEVERS; 3. Only Jejeemons use "U" instead of you; 4. It would have been stronger if you used ARSE instead of FARCE to drive your point. I would have been your follower.


    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous tita, you're old and mean. You sound educated but have the mentality of nothing more than those who scour trashbins for food. You cant just tell others what to do. Live and let live you old fuck.

    ReplyDelete
  29. "retards belongs to special school... not because they deserve to but because they have to, those who open blogs like this and provide easy, appealing make believe quick fix to retards, and intentionally provide their link to popular lounges for beginners like T.I.E. are either desperately seeking attention or have a very dark hidden agenda, you know damn well that those who frequent that site (T.I.E) are as u may agree the not so brightest among the bunch, always asking when to sell what to buy... i implore u to heed my call and shut your blog down, before you make a believer of somebody else when you know damn well you have nothing to provide them... keep your diary to yourself that's what diaries are for, a PERSONAL account of one's self not to be shared.


    ps: providing a disclaimer on a blog like this is like taking a diabetic to a sweet shop!"

    MY COMMENTS: Only retards do not know the proper use of punctuation marks. Only retards commit commit lapses in grammar and logic. The correct statement should be: "Retards belong to special schools, retards belong to a special school." Sa grammar at punctuation marks pa lang sablay na. Langya naman. Were you sleeping in grammar school, arse? Agenda is plural. Agendum, singular. mali ka na sa paggmait pa lang ng RETARDS BELONGS saka A VERY DARK HIDDEN AGENDA. Ok na sana eh. Kaso epal ka eh. Yun jejemon ka na naman. Para naman professional ka kuno at dahil matanda ka na you should use "YOU" instead of "U" lang. Sus. Even a toddler would know the difference. Eto mali din grammar: "what diaries are for, a PERSONAL account of one's self not to be shared." Dapat DIARIES ARE... PERSONAL ACCOUNTS OF PEOPLE. One's self tapos DIARIES?! Wahahaha. Damn! Bobo ka Tita! Subject-verb agreement pa lang wala ka na eh. Sa elementary pa lang itinuturo na yan eh! Hahaha

    Leave Zeefreaks alone!

    ReplyDelete
  30. You write and sound like Leptokurtosis of stockmarketpilipinas.com, Tita Hater!

    You can't even put proper punctuation marks in your sentences. You've been having some lapses in grammar, logic, etc. Why? have you been sleeping all day in class before? Hahaha

    ReplyDelete
  31. "this is nonsense, what would stop it from doing a fall 76.4% retracement or 100% , answer none, always easy to claim shit hindsight! this is just a warning to your would be believers, that u know better than they do when u play fibonacci, farce!"

    MY COMMENTS: 1. It's more correct to ask this: "WHAT WOULD STOP IT FROM FALLING TO 76.4% OR DOING A RETRACEMENT at 100%?"; 2. WOULD-BE BELIEVERS and not WOULD BE BELIEVERS; 3. Only Jejemons use "U" instead of you; 4. It would have been stronger if you used ARSE instead of FARCE to drive your point. I would have been your follower.

    ReplyDelete
  32. What works for you Tita Hater may not work for me. What works for me may not work for you. Same logic involving you, me, Zeefreaks, and any trader or anyone for that matter. You get the drift. But I guess you won't because you're a retard. There's no holy grail in everything. I guess you have not accomplished anything in your miserable life. Or if you have anything to brag about, why would you waste your time here? Shouldn't you be on a cruise to the Bahamas or on a private plane to Peru?

    ReplyDelete
  33. ^he cant do that he's totally broke. the very reason why anonymous tita is trolling all over the place.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Someone give this person a plane ticket to Baghdad. I heard its fun over there.

    ReplyDelete
  35. "i do not intend to give quick fix to idiots"

    Si Leptokurtosis ka nga ng SMP. You used "quick fix" in the MEG thread of that forum. And then you used it here. Har har har

    ReplyDelete
  36. na buang na pud na si tita uyy..hahaha

    ReplyDelete
  37. sir on bounce plays, is there any timeframe on the fib to plot? Is the Current peak still your reference even on downtrend bounce

    ReplyDelete
  38. Timeframe for the bounce should be 2 days up to a week (max). And the current recent peak should be your reference for fibo.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Thanks sir zee for this info. Ask ko lng are u using an 8 EMA to signal when to sell?

    ReplyDelete
  40. grabe, natapos ko rin basahin ang thread na 'to...
    gotcha haha...Tita Ninny, di man lang nakaramdam =)

    ReplyDelete
  41. Hihi haba ng usapan

    ReplyDelete
  42. Kamusta na sya zee? Galit parin ba iyon hater mo?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Haha. Si Tita Hater mula May 2012 hanggang Feb 2013 nagrereply siya. xD Hello Tita! Still there? ^_^

    ReplyDelete
  44. amfotah!!
    d fuck dis thread hihihihihihi

    ReplyDelete
  45. Where is tita now? Haha

    ReplyDelete
  46. di talaga nawawala ang kontrabida sa mundo..mga tipong masyadong bitter sa life,negative people at di marunong mag appreciate ng magandang ginagawa ng ibang tao..yung tipong gusto ka pabagsakin instead na dapat tulungan..mukhang dedbol na cguro c anonymous hater kaya ala na reply bka naubusan na ng blood sugar sa katawan..to Zeafreak--SALUTE!

    ReplyDelete
  47. Huling balita ko kay tita, na-stroke na dala ng old age...tsk tsk. R.I.P

    ReplyDelete
  48. It seems that the bounce play for ORE failed Zee. I completely understand that this happens, a lot. What I'm curious of is what are the factors that made it fail? And what could be the cues signaling an exit to prevent further loss?

    P.S.
    I'm one of the IDIOTS Tita here is talking about :D Still a noob. For now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are right. It never reached that price again as of August 2016. Would have lost money big time. A stop loss of 6.76 - 6.78 (from May 8) might have helped sold the position on May 9. Prevent further loss. Maybe?

      Delete
  49. Thanks Boss Z sa bounceplays tips at pagbasa..... GRAN

    ReplyDelete
  50. si tita kasi ayaw ng free info, gusto niya may bayad ang pagtulong niya sa mga newbie na tulad ko.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Sir Zee, sa pag plot ninyo ng fibo, ano po ang kinoconsider ninyo. Yung wick or yung body ng candle. Salamat po in advance sa reply.

    ReplyDelete
  52. for 5 years, tita is still following ZF comments on this thread. hihihi

    ReplyDelete
  53. Hello Tita Ninny! How have you been? <3
    I actually enjoyed the comments by Tita Ninny. HAHAHA.
    Spending a lot of time just to ask ZF to take down this blog. AS IF naman susundin ka nya. lols.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Wow! That's hate! But nonetheless, this blog is informative.
    I still accompany what i learn here with further research. It's faster to understand the technial books/ refernces full of jargons after reading this blog. TY Sir ZF!


    Just can shake off an excerpt from May 24, 2012 at 1:50 PM by Anonymous Hater:
    "...Your not even in my maid's league..."

    Hmmm... May not have bearing at that time. Just an observation.

    ReplyDelete
  55. kelan kaya mag karon ng season 2 ang Zee vs. Tita?

    ReplyDelete
  56. Looks like someone else went down.

    Good thing it's not Zee and this blog :P

    ReplyDelete
  57. ito pala si tita ninny sa presentation mo zeefreaks sa investa ��

    ReplyDelete
  58. Woke up early @4:30am to finish a report on my freelance. Decided to do a sneak peek first to ZF's blog about bounce. Niiice. Next thing i knew 5:35am na wala pa ko nagagawang report update dahil sa exciting word war sa comment thread section! lol!

    PS. Sir ZF, wag mo isara blog mo sir ha. Kakaumpisa ko pa lang mag aral ng stock trading. Your blog has helped me a lot in doing better TA. Hayaan mo na ung mga bashers. Lets just spread the love instead. Peace!

    ReplyDelete
  59. Sir ZF, more power to you and your tribe. I'm still a newbie in stock trading and I strongly believe you blog will help many so don't mind your basher. Actually I didn't finish reading the word war...I know what I believe and reading Titas comments is just a complete waste of time.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Came back here because of your breaking high free vid. Thanks again for inspiring. More pawer.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Salamat Lodi Zee! More Power!

    ReplyDelete
  62. This is the first time ever na nakabasa ako ng write-up tungkol sa bounce play although lagi ko ito naririnig na term kai Miss Guillen Rocher.

    Thank you boss Zeefreaks.

    Wala talaga ako balak magcomment kaya lang nacurious ako ng todo. Tanong ko lang: Buhay pa ba si Tita? Heehe.

    ReplyDelete
  63. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Its half of 2018 and Sir Zee and his tribe has gone bigger, stronger,, and PAWERful!

    What about Tita Ninny? I bet she's still miserable and hateful as ever...

    MORE POWER ZFT!

    ReplyDelete
  65. Thank you for not deactivating sir Zee. =)

    ReplyDelete
  66. Thank you for not deactivating Sir Zee!!! =)

    ReplyDelete
  67. Wow!...ang haba ng discussion nila...it seems that TITA has already conceded. Both have proven their point but for me it's still the trader's decision to pull the trigger or not. Sarado lang kasi ang utak ni TITA dahil di niya maintindihan na sine-share lang ni master ZF ang kanyang strategy sa blog niya. I'ts still up to us as trader kung susundin natin ito or hindi. More power to you sir zeefreek!

    ReplyDelete
  68. Ano ibig sabihin ng "61.8% and 76.4% Retracements would be the ideal crash-point for pickup" sir zee? Cut point po ba pag di nasunod bias mo or bounce point? sorry sir medyo slow :D

    ReplyDelete
  69. Natatawa parin ako everytime I re-read this blog. Hi Tita Ninny. :)))

    ReplyDelete
  70. Sir Zee thnx much now lng ako magsisimula magbasa sa mga blogs mo regarding sa bounce play..sana matutunan ko rin to.hehe

    ReplyDelete
  71. ang laki na cguro ng talo ng haters mo sir. Let's pray for him!!!

    ReplyDelete
  72. Segi maki chismiss din ako..ang haba ng palitan ng kuro2x at muntik nako mahilo! ;-)
    Si "tito" daw may katulong at nag e "invest" daw sa stockmarket! hmmppp...kilala nyo na ata tong magaling mag English! at sabi di daw e kumpara si ZF sa katulong nya sa league nila? hahaha...well, ako din ay isa sa mga "subscriber" ni tito sa site nya. pero sa kalaunan di rin ako naging successful kasi gusto nya na "susunod" kalang sa kanyang mga "instructions" kuno na galing sa isang "magaling" at noted na "broker". ngayun, ang mga stocks nya ay puro "bluechips" at yang mga yan ay "long term" investments daw. well, sa nakikita ko ay itong si tito ay "HINDI" marunong mag "Technical Analysis"! at since may bayad ang website nya ay mawawalan sya ng mga subscriber kung itong mga tao na ito ay matutong mag analyze ng charting? at since si ZF ay magaling mag analyze e di "treat" sya sa "earnings" nitong tito na to at sino pabang magpapaloko sa mga "strategic averaging method" na pinapasunod nya sa mga tao kung matututo na itong mag charting ng di kailangan magbayad? at for info sa lahat...yang "strategic method" na sinasabi nya ay makikita mo rin sa website ng colfinancial: click Research/Technicals/Technical Guide then click "View/Print(Adobe Format). Goodluck ZF!

    ReplyDelete
  73. I thought mahaba yung blog, mahaba lang pala yung comment especially si tita ninny. XD

    ReplyDelete
  74. I know who you are referring to and I tell you, the "hater"/""tito" is not him. Just because he mentioned "maid" sya na agad? Dude I can always impersonate any person or mention similar circumstances in life but it does not make it me. (Probably, the person right now is laughing from being spared by all the criticisms since you all think he is another guy haha) And I know him, he is in no way like that. He even suggested that I enroll at Caylum. Actually I subscribed to his services back then (I dont anymore since I learned how to TA from Caylum and ZF; his service was a slow horse, but it works for the other 99%). But boy, I tell you, its different than COL's Technical guide. And by the way, most of the ones researching and writing on that site are also from COL/Citisec such as the likes of Edward Lee himself. And its not just pure SAM. Most of it are intangibles and mindset. I would even consider subscribing again just for those intangibles and ignore the SAM completely. His site is not for us who have time to learn and monitor the market. We are part of the 1% of the PH population who can trade; the other 99% just doesn't have the privilege of time and the consequence to be able to study TA. He always reiterates that SAM is for someone who doesn't have the time to monitor the market because of other higher obligatory functions in life; these people do not trade for a living, rather they use the PSE to preserve and somehow appreciate their capitals. He says that if you think trading is for you and you have the luxury of time, study as there are millions of resources online. He specifically recommended Caylum. I dont know if you have anything against Caylum but I think their FTSR works and is logical. Also, you would learn from Taylor himself and ZF has his respects on him.

    The one you mistakenly identified as the hater/tito was my first "mentor" and currently is on other aspects of life. ZF, MG, Kap, Boomie, Mesino, Javi, Edmund and Lawrence Lee are my "mentors" in the trading game now but I do not and will no discount any teachings the first one gave to me. Yun lang, peace.

    P.S. Tama nga sabi ni ZF dati sa investacup defense niya, masaya pala comments section dito hahaha Anyways, we are part of the 1%. Let us make a good example so that we can invite the other 99%. Making false, unbacked, and rushed conclusions based on small hints or even pride is not what any trader should be right? #insiders go!

    ReplyDelete
  75. I hope the hater isn't who I think he is based on the maid controversy.

    ReplyDelete
  76. wow parang bear and bull lang go guys keep trading WORDS

    ReplyDelete
  77. Hello Tita Ninny :) hehe how are you??

    ReplyDelete
  78. puro kayo tita ninny eh hindi naman si tita ninny ni boss zee yan.. na alala lang ni boss zee ung tita ninny nya the way mag salita si anonymouse hater at tinawag nyang tita... dapat i tawag nyo jan si tita hater.

    PS: You remind me of my Tita Ninny. So I'll just call you Tita.

    ReplyDelete
  79. ang haba ng comments pero binasa ko lahat. salamat ZF

    ReplyDelete
  80. Haha!! Kahit anong balik ko sa site na to,, juicy pa din. Salamat ZF!
    Pwede na paframe un comment section :)

    ReplyDelete
  81. salamat ZF sa enlightenment.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Bakit pala 76.4 yung fib mo na picture pero sa investagrams 78.6
    Sensya na for the nitpick hehe pero im guessing di naman imporante yung number right? Ang importante yung general idea

    ReplyDelete
  83. Question boss Zee , how do you filter bounce play?

    ReplyDelete
  84. Lupit ng comment section, from 2012 to 2020!I missed Tita. . .

    ReplyDelete
  85. Sorry pero masydo akong nag enjoy sa comment section. Hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  86. Thank u ZF for the tips. Just continue your blogs. I believe you really have good intentions to help.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Super thanks for sharing boss Zee!

    ReplyDelete
  88. Tita made my day! Hahaha! This thread is very entertaining...

    ReplyDelete
  89. Haha.. I'm reviewing the bounce play thought to us last night and i saw the blog of zee.. pero mas na entertain ako comments.. Kumusta na kaya si Tita?
    For sure, we all know that as of today, this setup is really making money :-)

    ReplyDelete
  90. Ang bitter naman ni tita hahahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  91. Ang haba ng convo. kamusta nakaya si tita ?

    ReplyDelete
  92. Now it's 2022 but tita is still not here.

    ReplyDelete